The Language Fossils Buried in Every Cell of Your Body

Just stopping by to say that I am very much alive and still learning Korean despite the horrors rigors of graduate school.  How is everyone doing? :)

A couple months ago, I stumbled across this interesting article in Discover Magazine that I think is worth sharing:

The Language Fossils Buried in Every Cell of Your Body (click to read the article).

The article is about a certain gene known as FOXP2 which may, at least in part, be involved in the acquisition of language in humans.  As the article states:

FOXP2 didn’t give us language all on its own. In our brains, it acts more like a foreman, handing out instructions to at least 84 target genes in the developing basal ganglia. Even this full crew of genes explains language only in part, because the ability to form words is just the beginning. Then comes the higher level of complexity: combining words according to rules of grammar to give them meaning.

First of all, this is exciting.  I don’t care if you don’t like science but the idea that scientists have identified at least one gene (even if it’s not THE gene.  Chances are THE gene doesn’t even exist) that may be involved in a process as complex as language is kind of mind-blowing.  Humans seem to be the only species that have language and some have even gone so far as to speculate that language and communication is our “innate” ability, so identifying any kind of genetic connection to language is the first step in figuring out the evolution of language.

Obviously it’s difficult to come up with… um… ethical models to study language at the genetic level.  But the fact that certain individuals with language defects have very specific mutations in FOXP2 is fairly convincing evidence that the gene is one of the key orchestrators of language acquisition.  Personally, I’m not sure how much I believe in the existence of a single “grammar” gene or a “syntax” gene, as the article mentions in its concluding sentence, but I’ll have to read up more on the actual neuroscience behind speech and language before I form a solid opinion about it.  It’s an interesting thought though.  And also, mutations don’t necessarily have to have negative effects so it would be interesting to see if polyglots have any beneficial mutations in the FOXP2 gene and/or differential growth and activation of the neurons under its control.  Then again, scientists like to attribute everything and anything to genetics these days but that’s a debate I’d rather not get into.

Wheeeee!  Cool, cool stuff.  And extra cool because the FOXP2 protein is actually part of the same family of DNA regulator proteins as FOXP3, which I’ve been reading a lot about in my classes.  Interestingly, FOXP3 is completely unrelated to language – it’s a key regulator of a special type of immune cells in your body.  But I digress.

Thoughts on the “language gene” anyone?

Biology of the language-learning brain

A lot of my friends are neuroscience majors so, out of curiosity and because I had some extra space in my schedule, I decided to take an intro-level behavioral neuroscience course this semester.


I have never experienced a class so frustratingly boring in my life.  And it’s a real pity because I know that neuroscience can and should be somewhat interesting (it’s the brain, for heaven’s sake) but… it’s not.

Except for today.


We started talking about language and cognition and of course my ears perked up because I’ve always had a fascination for the science behind learning a foreign language.  How does the brain comprehend new phonemes and new grammar structures?  Where and how does it form a new “dictionary”?  How does it affect other parts of behavior?  To what extent is language a learned behavior and to what extent is it innate?

If anyone else is interested in this topic, I suggest NOT taking a neuroscience class.  Instead, try perusing The Language Instinct by Harvard professor, cognitive scientist, and linguist Steven Pinker.  What an incredible book.  It ties language to science to psychology in a neat, seamless fashion.  (That book really deserves it’s own post.)

Anyway, our class is taught by an MD which means we approach language from a clinical point of view, basically by asking questions like – if you have a lesion in this particular part of the brain, what happens to your language ability, what happens to your understanding?  For example, damage to the frontal lobe of your brain may lead to Broca’s aphasia where the patient can comprehend and analyze everything that’s being said but cannot express language (either spoken or written).  This makes sense because the “Broca area” of the brain is involved in speech delivery.  On the other hand, damage to the temporal lobe may result in Wernicke’s aphasia, which is characterized by an ability to express language but not understanding.  The “Wernicke area” of the brain is responsible for retrieving correct, meaningful words so any lesions in this part of the brain results in nonsensical speech.  Interesting.

We also talked about something that’s probably more relevant to me and other readers of this blog – how multilingualism works.  Most people know that the younger you are, the easier it is to learn a new language.  Precisely, 8-11 years or younger.  And this is because of brain plasticity, or it’s ability to change as a result of one’s experience.  It’s truly incredible how plastic your brain can be at a young age.  For example, my five-year-old cousin can understand and speak the six different languages she’s exposed to on a daily basis – Marathi (her mom’s mother tongue), Hindi (her mom’s second language), Telugu (her dad’s mother tongue), Kannada (the local language where she lives), English (which she learns in school) and Tamil (her great-aunt’s second language).

Obviously when you know that many languages, your brain has to have specific areas where it stores these language “dictionaries” (i.e. the vocabulary and rules of the language that you have to remember).  Otherwise, you’d be randomly using words from the different languages when you speak.  What is fascinating is that if you learn multiple languages when you’re at a younger age (<8 y.o.), your language dictionaries are stored in the same part of your brain.  But when you learn them when you’re older, your brain is less plastic and your foreign language dictionaries are stored in a different part of your brain, away from your mother tongue dictionary!

Now, knowing that, what if someone has a stroke?  Stroke happens when certain parts of the brain don’t receive adequate blood supply and, if that part of the brain has to do with language, stroke may result in the inability to understand and/or formulate speech.  BUT!  What if you are bilingual and you have your language dictionaries stored in different parts of the brain?  Then, a stroke patient could potentially lose the ability to communicate in one language but be perfectly fine in another language!  (So it’s a stretch, but yes, there are health benefits to learning languages.^^)

My neuroscience professor insisted that it is very difficult for “normal” people to learn foreign languages once they are an adult.  According to him, because the adult brain is less plastic, it constantly translates the language it is learning back into its native language.  Well, I disagree.  I was like that with Korean at first, but now I feel like I can read and listen to Korean and understand in real-time.  I used to think that anyone who wanted to learn a language can sit down and do it, as long as they had the time and the will.  Turns out that success is not entirely dependent on the amount of effort put in.  Success in language-learning as an adult is in part determined by genetics.

You know polyglots, those geniuses who seem to pick up foreign languages as easily as they breathe?  Turns out that’s genetic as well.  My mom’s been saying this for years – my grandfather is a polyglot and she insisted that I got my language thing from him but it wasn’t until I heard it in class that I really believed it.  Turns out that it’s possible the Broca area of the brain might be organized differently in those who are polyglots and in those who are not.

Whew.  I could go on and on but I’ll stop now before I write a book.  As a scientist and an aspiring (?) polyglot, I just get so enthusiastic about the link between science and language.  Check out Steven Pinker’s book for more about this awesomeness!!  XD